Skip to main content

Head-less and Tail-less.

Crisp. This single five letter word evokes many feelings and pleasant sceneries within us, only upon dwelling though. It may be the delicious crunch of a packet of chips, the refreshing atmosphere surrounding us or one of the many letter-assortments availed to emphasize an individual’s character, to name a few. I will portray this word in a completely new light in this essay, as that in relation to the broad canvas spanned by cyber-borders and its ilk.

To initiate the discussion, let us take the case of Narendra Modi, the honourable Prime Minister of India. He ushered in a new paradigm of campaigning in the prelude to the Lok Sabha elections in 2014. Successfully wielding the weapon of social media, he lured the major demographic of India: the youth. That he won the election by a staggering margin is ample proof of what social media and in broader terms, what the Internet can do. The question being debated here is not the after-shocks of social media but the exploitation of the Internet to safeguard a land’s varied interests. Internet has propelled our database of mental information to sky-high limits. But of what use is data unless it is coupled with thorough understanding and an application oriented approach? Each of the above complements the other. Perusing through volumes of data, let it be of any kind, with the hindsight objective of applying it in practical situations will ultimately lead to perfect understanding of the data. Hence, it is a recursive cycle that is bound to benefit the scrutinizer.

Before the advent of social media, people relied on e-mails and faxes to relay information overseas. Communicating with relatives abroad set off explosions in expenses. Social media has blurred the lines of such communications. As always, any technological advancement is escorted by side-effects. Twitter and Facebook brought us into contact people whose faces or names we have never seen or heard, or would see or hear in the near future. We share our experiences with unknown people on the Internet, recount tales of joy and agony, aggressively market our views on political, cultural, legal and other aspects of our own nation and comment on the above-said aspects of their nation. I am fairly sure you are aware of where all this will lead to, if you do not tread carefully.

Of the above mentioned, I will take into consideration to the third aspect, that of expressing views on our land. Let me cover the political angle first. We have repeatedly heard the saying ‘The grass is always greener on the other side’. Supposing you are a citizen of the nation ‘X’. You tune into the news channel and see the results of the polls of the nation ‘Y’. Intrigued by the results, you open your MacBook Air to research on the methodology of elections of ‘Y’. Et Voila! The familiar feeling of déjà vu occurs. You feel that the method employed by X to conduct elections pales in comparison to that employed by Y. As you delve further into your research, your initial feeling begins to gain a stronger foothold in the recesses of your brain. The frustration and the need for a change pushes you to tweet and post disguised abuses against the method. Someone somewhere in your nation who might be on your ‘Friend’ list for reasons unknownst to you, chances upon this post and riles you up. This is the beginning of a storm which if not quenched early, will ravage you. You will be branded non-patriotic, pessimistic and what not. Yet another view on this angle will be the exploits of your country’s leader and the counterpart in your ‘friend’s country. Both of you wrangle on topics that involve your leaders and might range from the mundane to the extraordinary. Both of you would not be willing to give in to the other’s arguments and as a result, the debate widens its horizon to include more members. Thus it gains a huge scale and suddenly, you find yourself in the midst of a controversy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

From stranger, to stranger.

Wow! It has been a long time since I blogged. A glance at the last post shows that two months has whizzed past and that I don't have a single post during that period. I hope to make amends for the involuntary hibernation by weekly posting from now. And so here goes the first of them. Trust. Every one of us trusts some individual in our passage towards higher echelons of life, don't we? But as we indulge in conversations with our peers, we find that some render trust generously while the rest waver under veiled gardens. Why is there a disparity when all of us are cut from the same fabric? The solution to this query lies under the oft-quoted answer "Our past experiences make us trust less!" So true, right? We meet a stranger on the road sharing our same taste and as the conversation proceeds (or not, depending on what our moms taught us!), we connect with them at a level that, in truth, cannot be quantified. Strangers on roads are not exactly potential candidat...

Stop Ea'zh'th-qu'ack'ing!

I will bring to the fore two disturbing trends that plagued me whenever I stumble on it. These two are entirely unrelated. The first one being the pronunciation of the word "Earthquake" and the next being the sound that 'r' suffers in the tongues of Indians mimicking the Brits and the Americans. Yes, I agree there are other words pronounced wrongly but this particular word had the power to draw me in to a mode of introspection, albeit for weird reason. I have encountered gentlemen and women pronouncing the word as Earth-qu'ack'. They are not of a particular category. These gentlemen span the range of all the seven stages of life, yet most of them don't seem to be concerned that they spell the word in an embarrassing way. Maybe their teachers had pronounced it so, maybe they ignored the thorn in lieu of the bigger scheme, whatever might be the reason, I consider it  a blemish on their record, more so if they happen to be English lecturers. The correct pr...